Saturday, June 23, 2018
Saturday, May 19, 2018
Tuesday, April 24, 2018
Saturday, April 21, 2018
Week 14
OK. Read this carefully.
These are the questions I promised you. I'm not looking for "answers." I'm looking for responses that show that you can discuss these ideas clearly, with an awareness of the range of views we've explored.
I want 2-3 page responses. And I want it all in your own words. And I want it all to be your own work--wander through our readings, but I'm not asking for (and don't want) outside research or citations. I want your thorough thought and nuanced articulation. (If it helps, pretend that you'll be teaching a lesson on each topic--and write like your job is to explore the various sides of the issue. We want good, clear, organized responses.)
These have different due dates, and they are firm.
The first one is due in class on Tuesday.
The second one is due in class on Thursday.
These will also be the discussion topics of those days, so you have to have the assignment ready, or you can't sit in on the discussion. And that would be bad. Grade-wise.
The last two responses are both due on May 9 at 5pm. Email them to me.
Feel free to ask me any questions you have about these things.
1. What considerations are most important in thinking about the advantages and disadvantages of relative and absolute measures of poverty?
2. What, according to Harrington, is integration supposed to accomplish? And why, according to Riley (and Gilder, if you want) is it doomed to fail?
3. Both liberals and conservatives appear to be convinced that the various fractures that have afflicted the traditional heterosexual, nuclear family are causally related to poverty. Is there a path to diminishing poverty that does not require restoring that traditional social form? First answer this in the affirmative, then in the negative. Support your response in each case as you discuss the issues.
4. Harrington, Gilder, and Riley all seem to invoke the notion of a "culture" of poverty. What are the advantages and hazards of employing such a notion? What is the best specification of the idea you can give that captures something important yet avoids likely misuse?
These are the questions I promised you. I'm not looking for "answers." I'm looking for responses that show that you can discuss these ideas clearly, with an awareness of the range of views we've explored.
I want 2-3 page responses. And I want it all in your own words. And I want it all to be your own work--wander through our readings, but I'm not asking for (and don't want) outside research or citations. I want your thorough thought and nuanced articulation. (If it helps, pretend that you'll be teaching a lesson on each topic--and write like your job is to explore the various sides of the issue. We want good, clear, organized responses.)
These have different due dates, and they are firm.
The first one is due in class on Tuesday.
The second one is due in class on Thursday.
These will also be the discussion topics of those days, so you have to have the assignment ready, or you can't sit in on the discussion. And that would be bad. Grade-wise.
The last two responses are both due on May 9 at 5pm. Email them to me.
Feel free to ask me any questions you have about these things.
1. What considerations are most important in thinking about the advantages and disadvantages of relative and absolute measures of poverty?
2. What, according to Harrington, is integration supposed to accomplish? And why, according to Riley (and Gilder, if you want) is it doomed to fail?
3. Both liberals and conservatives appear to be convinced that the various fractures that have afflicted the traditional heterosexual, nuclear family are causally related to poverty. Is there a path to diminishing poverty that does not require restoring that traditional social form? First answer this in the affirmative, then in the negative. Support your response in each case as you discuss the issues.
4. Harrington, Gilder, and Riley all seem to invoke the notion of a "culture" of poverty. What are the advantages and hazards of employing such a notion? What is the best specification of the idea you can give that captures something important yet avoids likely misuse?
Tuesday, April 17, 2018
Friday, April 13, 2018
Saturday, April 7, 2018
For Tuesday, April 10
Carefully read the introduction and first two chapters of _Please Stop Helping Us_ by Riley.
We won't have class on Thursday, the 12th. But for the following Tuesday, a short writing assignment will be due. I'll post about that soon.
We won't have class on Thursday, the 12th. But for the following Tuesday, a short writing assignment will be due. I'll post about that soon.
Tuesday, April 3, 2018
Monday, April 2, 2018
Wednesday, March 21, 2018
Assignment for Thursday, Mar. 29
Read the next three chapters in Gilder. And since we're going in a straight line, feel free to read more. But those three at least. Take good notes.
(Also, the Bookstore tells me that another of our books is finally in stock. Please get that at your earliest convenience.)
(Also, the Bookstore tells me that another of our books is finally in stock. Please get that at your earliest convenience.)
Tuesday, March 13, 2018
For Thursday
Just read one more chapter in Gilder.
Look, I know that it is painful. But think of it as a foil--it can help us to define and articulate what we think. That's not always easy to do well without encountering a view very different from one's own.
Thanks for the good discussion in class today.
Look, I know that it is painful. But think of it as a foil--it can help us to define and articulate what we think. That's not always easy to do well without encountering a view very different from one's own.
Thanks for the good discussion in class today.
Sunday, March 11, 2018
Unusual Extra Credit Opportunity
This has nothing to do with our class, but it is an important bit of
college business, so I'll give you extra credit if you attend. The
guest speaker is on campus interviewing for a job in Classics, and his
"sample" presentation will go better if there are some students in the
room. No pressure, just making it available.
Monday at 4:15 in Fausett 22: "Inglorious Praise: A How-To Guide" by Dr. Martin Shedd.
We'll learn about way ancient Romans were trained in rhetoric & how they were able to manipulate rhetorical templates to send--in subtle, sneaky, and clever ways--the messages they wanted to.
Monday at 4:15 in Fausett 22: "Inglorious Praise: A How-To Guide" by Dr. Martin Shedd.
We'll learn about way ancient Romans were trained in rhetoric & how they were able to manipulate rhetorical templates to send--in subtle, sneaky, and clever ways--the messages they wanted to.
Saturday, March 10, 2018
Tuesday, March 6, 2018
Assignment for Thursday, Mar. 8
You might have heard that Arkansas just passed a law requiring Medicare recipients to work or undergo job training. There are exemptions for those with children and for those with medical and other sorts of restrictions. See HERE.
But I assume that these people about to be "motivated" to work will join the low wage economy described by Ehrenreich.
Perhaps it is a cynical view, but my first thought about it was: "if you want any support from us, you must place yourself in the trap, and become an unwilling donor to the lifestyles of the better off."
Anyway, for Thursday, read all intros and prefaces and the first two chapters in Gilder's _Weath and Poverty_.
Take careful notes. You'll want them.
But I assume that these people about to be "motivated" to work will join the low wage economy described by Ehrenreich.
Perhaps it is a cynical view, but my first thought about it was: "if you want any support from us, you must place yourself in the trap, and become an unwilling donor to the lifestyles of the better off."
Anyway, for Thursday, read all intros and prefaces and the first two chapters in Gilder's _Weath and Poverty_.
Take careful notes. You'll want them.
Saturday, March 3, 2018
Sunday, February 25, 2018
Assignment for Tuesday, Feb. 27
Finish Harrington, all the way to the end. Get a couple of chapters into Ehrenreich.
Tuesday, February 20, 2018
Assignment for Thursday, Feb. 22
OK, we WILL have class.
Now then, 2 pages.
On the face of it, integration is not a source of income or a source of access to assistance. Harrington obviously thinks that big government power and money ought to help with income and assistance. But when it comes to racial prejudice and housing issues, he calls also for integration.
Last week, we worried about how a strategy of integration could be a threat to the identity of a community. Ignore those kinds of worries for a moment and try to dial in on What Harrington thinks that integration could bring--in race and in housing (and they are obviously related). What are the evils that he thinks it would fight? The goods that he thinks it would bring? And do you agree? Why?
Review those two chapters and give me your thoughts. Bring it to class--we'll talk about it.
Now then, 2 pages.
On the face of it, integration is not a source of income or a source of access to assistance. Harrington obviously thinks that big government power and money ought to help with income and assistance. But when it comes to racial prejudice and housing issues, he calls also for integration.
Last week, we worried about how a strategy of integration could be a threat to the identity of a community. Ignore those kinds of worries for a moment and try to dial in on What Harrington thinks that integration could bring--in race and in housing (and they are obviously related). What are the evils that he thinks it would fight? The goods that he thinks it would bring? And do you agree? Why?
Review those two chapters and give me your thoughts. Bring it to class--we'll talk about it.
Monday, February 19, 2018
Friday, February 16, 2018
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)